Next: About this document ...
CLASS #13: EQUILIBRIUM IN THE LABOR MARKET
- How is equilibrium determined?
- How do labor taxes affect the equilibrium?
- Unemployment
- The relationship between output and unemployment: Okun's law
Labor Market Equilibrium
There is an equilibrium level of real wages w* such that labor demand is
equal to labor supply.
When w<w* there is excess demand for labor, which induces firms to bid
wages up.
When w<w* there is excess supply of labor, which induces firms to bid
wages down.
Labor Taxes and Equilibrium Wages and Employment
If firms have to pay 10 % of the wage as, say, social security contribution,
their perceived cost of labor is 10% higher: the labor demand curve
shifts down.
or
If workers have to pay a 10% tax on their income, their perceived
earnings are 10% lower: the labor supply curve shifts up.
or
Taxes are equivalent to increase the marginal utility of leisure from UL to
,
and therefore induce people to work less, for any given pre-tax wage.
social security contributions and income taxes lower
equilibrium employment.
Unemployment
Measuring unemployment:
Labor force= number of employed + number of unemployed
Labor force participation rate=Labor force/Adult population (66% in US)
In order to be considered unemployed one has to be actively looking for a
job. Discouraged workers are not counted as unemployed, but just dropped
from the labor force.
Frictional unemployment
Job search: people looking for the "right" job (example: tenant and
landlord).
Structural unemployment
Low skilled workers: cannot find a job at any wage.
Full employment
We have full employment when the only kind of unemployment is structural or
frictional (no pressure on wages).
Natural rate of unemployment= structural + frictional
Cyclical unemployment= actual unemployment - natural rate =
Okun's law
How much does output decrease in % terms when cyclical unemployment
increases?
Okun's law is an empirical relationship:
when cyclical unemployment rises:
- labor force declines (discouraged workers)
- hours per worker decline
- productivity declines
Modeling the natural rate
Why should we be interested in modeling the natural rate?
Because it changes over time and, more importantly, it changes a lot across
countries.
|
Unemployment (%) |
Long term unemployment |
|
% |
% of total unemployment |
|
74-79 |
80-89 |
96 |
79 |
89 |
Germany |
3.2 |
5.9 |
8.9 |
19.9 |
49 |
France |
4.5 |
9 |
12.4 |
30.3 |
43.9 |
Spain |
5.2 |
17.5 |
22.1 |
27.5 |
58.5 |
UK |
5 |
10 |
8.2 |
24.5 |
40.8 |
US |
6.7 |
7.2 |
5.4 |
4.2 |
5.7 |
A model of the natural rate
Define U= number of unemployed people;
E= number of employed people;
L= U+E= total labor force; f= job finding rate;
fU= unempl. become empl.; (1-f)U= unempl. stay unempl.;
s= job separation rate; sE= empl. become unempl.
So the law of motion for Unemployment is:
Ut+1=(1-f)Ut+sEt
or
Ut+1=(1-f)Ut+s(L-Ut)
At the steady state (long run)
Ut+1= Ut=Us
Solve for Us and obtain:
As f increases,
decreases
Obtain that the natural rate is a function of the separation rate (s) and
of the finding rate (f).
What happen when Unemployment Insurance programs are very generous?
Incentives to look for a job decrease.
But UI programs in Europe were very generous back from the 50's. Why
are differences in natural unemployment rates appearing only in the 80's?
Sargent and Ljungqvist: human capital story + changes in technology.
Next: About this document ...
Marco Del Negro
2000-02-24